The findings of its
analysis, which included more than 40 relevant studies, were published
April 13 in The New England Journal of Medicine. The authors say common threads in existing studies and isolated cases,
along with the absence of an alternative explanation, confirms the link.
“This study marks a turning point in the Zika
outbreak,” Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the CDC, said in a press statement. “It
is now clear that the virus causes microcephaly. We are also launching further
studies to determine whether children who have microcephaly born to mothers
infected by the Zika virus is the tip of the iceberg of what we could see in
damaging effects on the brain and other developmental problems.”
He added that these
findings affirm the CDC’s
existing guidance for women who are pregnant or
wish to conceive to avoid travel to countries affected by the outbreak. “
We are working to do everything possible to protect the American public,”
Frieden said.
Since the current
outbreak began a little more than a year ago, at least 4,000 infants in Brazil
have been born with microcephaly, a birth defect in which a baby has an
abnormally small skull and incomplete brain development. Researchers also
reported a smaller cluster of Zika-linked microcephaly with eight confirmed
cases during an outbreak in French Polynesia that occurred between 2013 and
2014.
In early February,
the World Health Organization declared Zika-related microcephaly a “public
health emergency of international concern” and urged a global coordinated response to improve surveillance of Zika infections and
congenital defects that occur in countries with outbreaks.
Researchers have
been unable to confirm the link in a single study; nearly all have limitations
even recognized by their researchers, which include small sample sizes and lack
of control groups.
In the
analysis, the authors recognize a consistent set of features in congenital Zika
infections including severe microcephaly; brain calcifications and other
abnormalities; certain eye defects that could threaten vision; redundant skin
on the scalp; arthrogryposis (curvature of the joints); and clubfoot. Zika
infections in pregnant women also have been linked to
miscarriages and stillbirth.
A new paper in BMJ, also published April 13, describes these congenital
abnormalities in greater detail. A group of researchers conducted exams on 23
infants born with microcephaly infections in Pernambuco, Brazil between July
and December 2015. Of the cohort, 15 underwent CT scans, seven underwent both
MRI and CT scans and one of the infants only underwent an MRI. After analyzing
the medical imaging, the researchers described the majority of the brain damage
in the infants as “extremely severe.”
All but one of the
mothers reported rash during pregnancy, and tested positive for the Zika virus.
Six of the infants tested positive for Zika antibodies, while the remaining 17
met the clinical protocol for microcephaly. Through blood tests, the researchers
ruled out other possible causes for birth defects, including toxoplasmosis,
cytomegalovirus, rubella, syphilis and HIV.
In CT scans of
infants, they identified calcifications in brain tissue. Scientists have
suspected for some time that the Zika virus kills brain cells, which causes
lesions, or scars, to the brain that leave calcium deposits. The infants were
also found to have underdeveloped cerebellums—responsible for motor control—and
brainstems, which connects the brain to the spine.
Some of the infants
also had malformations to the outer (cortical) area of the brain, as well as
decreased brain volume and enlarged brain cavities. The scans also suggested
delayed myelination in the infants. Myelin sheaths form around nerves and
they’re essential to facilitating communication between the brain’s two
hemispheres. While this was an observational study, it is in line with findings
from other case studies on congenital Zika infections. The authors come to a
similar conclusion as the CDC: Microcephaly is just but one feature in what
many are now clinically describing as Zika virus congenital syndrome.
Comments
Post a Comment